Agit Disco

AGIT DISCOedited by Stefan Szczelkun and Anthony Iles, 2012 Mute Books
review by Simon Poulter, February 2012

Walking into a record shop in Hamilton, Ontario last year, it was as if I was going back in time. It is hard not to be sentimental about such places – the smell, the sense of anticipation and the overall experience of a physical space full of music. Oh, a physical space…

One of my favourite songs is ‘Another Girl, Another Planet’ by the Only Ones and after scuffing around the shop I walked out with a used 12″ of ‘Special View’. Popular myth would have it that once upon a time there were formative list-makers, DJs such as John Peel, who would spend their time sifting through the world’s music and relaying it back to us via the fuzzy radios in our bedrooms. Then digital music formats appeared supplanting the rule of vinyl before music completely disappeared into data-space, evil piracy and downloads. Along the way the discourses between music, youth and activism changed when music as a popular networked medium gave way to the distributed torrent of the web. So music became ‘content’, free and subjected to random acts such as ‘shuffle’. The Poisoned Apple.

There is no shuffle in the work of Stefan Szczelkun. He has created a project in the form of a book that comprises of a series of suggested CD compilations assembled by invited cohorts. At first, the choice of a soon to be redundant medium such as the compact disc seems oddly perverse, yet Agit Disco offers a syncretic approach to the music histories that transport us from Muddy Waters to Mos Def. The contributors insights are of course reflective on their personal histories; for example Tom Jennings’ reminder that the source code of rap is direct action and not designer clothing. As far as I am aware there are no baseball caps or designer ales as a spin off from this book.

But Agit Disco is a book with a purpose. As soon as you pick it up you are reminded of the personal intimacy of the print medium. The book is anchored on the author’s long-standing connection to working class politics and its musical anthems and idiosyncrasies. As I have thumbed through it I have come to the unshakable conviction that with a straight shoot out between Google and Agit Disco, I would have a higher degree of finding something musically interesting from the observations of the contributors of the book. So there is still work to do on the algorithms of the semantic web, or higher granularity in the recommendations of a human who has listened.

The editors, Stefan Szczelkun and Anthony Iles, are fully aware that this is no contest and that their roles may lie more as archivists and not activists. While Julian Temple’s trilogy of films about punk act as an archaeology of personalities for example, there are still many layers beneath of lesser known mortals who have performed interesting acts. Indeed, Stefan Szczelkun’s credentials in mining and recording the cultural moments of London and the UK’s sub-cultures are impeccable and if I had one criticism of this book then it would be that it lacks a more in-depth narrative on these matters. But perhaps this is a future project that both the editors have in them, given the predominant focus on cult of personality in music writing and relative absence of a political story.

However in his introduction, Anthony Iles, expertly dispenses with the lame reconstructions and self-agrandisations of artists. Northern Soul, oh yes I saw that at an art gallery somewhere. He also points out that Agit Disco emanates from the blogosphere and a requirement to problematise aesthetics and criticality on music as a political force. Wryly, he draws attention to the contradictory status of celebrity within a countercultural milieu, so we have Stewart Home slotted in as a natural contributor here. Home’s playlist takes up the challenge wholeheartedly, recognising the importance of juxtaposition and classics – so we have Toots and the Maytals ’54-46 Was My Number’ spinning into ‘Don’t Be a Drop Out’ by James Brown and the “E Pluribus Unum’ by The Last Poets.

A comparator piece of writing that springs to mind is Paul Morley’s ‘Words and Music’, always bound to be trapped in time with its focus on Kylie Minogue. However, a quote from it:

“Some day music will only be air. There will be no objects to hold or fetishise and people will simply collect lists. No disc, nothing spooled or grooved, no heads to clean, no dust to wipe, no compulsive alphabetising.”

While most of this is true, we could argue that rather than collecting lists, more and more people are making them, as a consequence of distributed media and the disruption of the music industry distribution model. This is one of the most revolutionary actions of our time.

Agit Disco is therefore a project that combines friendships and associations with the full use of the extended communication of digital tools. It’s a book that utilises the aggregation effects of the web to hand the reader back some discrete thoughts and tunes.

Peter Conlin flags up Dissident Island [http://www.dissidentisland.org/] and a reminder that music creates a mutuality among generations as we ‘pick the same stuff’. This is never more problematic for some, where in the UK, we have apparently selected political leaders, who as well as studying PPE at Oxford, were listening to The Smiths, hunting stags and wreaking chaos in restaurants.

The last contributor to the book, Tracey Moberly, signs off her list with ‘I Don’t Give A Fuck’ by Peaches (with samples from Joan Jett). A truly seminal track that never fails to bring a smile to a misty grey morning wherever you are.

Ending on an Amazon moment – for aficionados of the UK underground, you might also like Stefan Szczelkun’s ‘Survival Scrapbooks’.

To purchase Agit Disco go to Metamute

Leave a comment

Paul Morley in Conversation

Paul Morley in Conversation

An interview with Paul Morley as part of the McLuhan’s Message Programme curated for Watershed Media Centre in October 2011.

 

Duration: 1hour 5mins 39secs

Leave a comment

“Listening to Firefox” – presenters

“Listening to Firefox” is finally here! After months of planning and organising, our inaugural North West salon/meet-up for discussion across “wider implications of software culture” is happening at 2pm Sunday 15th of May over at Manchester’s MadLab.

5 practitioners have been invited to present extremely short (<3mins) single-slide examples of work across a spectrum of digital-art-technology. From there, the emphasis moves to an open and critically aware roundtable discussion of the wider implications of this practice:

 

Stephen Fortune – Data and Reality

 

Markus Soukup -  relicts / 2011

John O’Shea – Open Source Swan Pedalo

Nick Holloway – UK libraries cuts map

Caroline Heron – “Precarious Labour”

 

Listening to Firefox exists to create a space for open and engaged discussion across a spectrum of digital-art-technology practice with an emphasis on the social, cultural and political implications of this work.  This inaugural event has been co-organised by John O’Shea, Simon Poulter and Hwa Young Jung at MadLab.

 

1 Comment

MadLab Manchester 15th May 2011

http://listeningtofirefox.eventbrite.com/

Wider Implications of Software Culture

The Event

  • What: Salon discussion and short presentations at Mad Lab in Manchester
  • When: Sunday 15th May – 2pm-4pm
  • Theme: “Open Source vs. The Big Society”

 

Listening to Firefox exists to create a space for open and engaged discussion across a spectrum of digital-art-technology practice with an emphasis on the social, cultural and political implications of this work.

 

Theme for this event: Open Source vs. The Big Society

 

Format: 5 practitioners are invited to present extremely short (<3mins) single-slide examples across a spectrum of digital-art-technology practice. From there, the emphasis moves to an open and critically aware roundtable discussion.

 

Rooted in practice, the event will facilitate greater peer awareness, cross-pollination and hopefully instigate conversations which need to be had!


Origins: Listening to Firefox emerged out of discussions held at the 2011 Metal/DEC Digital LAB held at Metal’s Chalkwell Hall in Southend on Sea. The LAB was facilitated by artists Graham Harwood and Simon Poulter and attended by 8 artists from a wide spectrum of disciplines.

Leave a comment

Listening to Firefox

…Now is perhaps a good time to resume our discussion about what we want to happen NEXT?

This is as far as we got:

“Listening to Firefox”
Sunday 15th May 2011
Manchester, UK time/venue TBC)
– Peer meet-up coinciding with FutureEverything festival

There are a couple of very interesting places in Manchester where we could all convene and, depending what people want to do, suggestions are currently Mad Lab (which is in the city centre, Northern Quarter) and Islington Mill (which is more industrial – about a twenty minute walk outside.)

I am imagining that we would eat some food together, have a chat and then have a plenary-type discussion where everyone would have the opportunity to share something relating to their own practice which has developed since beyond the Lab.  This format would provide a simple one-off opportunity to extend the peer environment we enjoyed during the Lab.

So – two questions:

Who would be intending coming to this? (Is it in your diary?)

What suggestions can people make regarding times, plan, preferred methods of communication etc.

I’ve copied this email to the blog so, rather than creating a huge email-list-tennis-session perhaps people could add their thoughts to the comment section beneath the post by clicking this link here.

Look forward to hearing from you all!

John

PS Here are some gems gleaned from the Lab discussions to refresh peoples memories:

*How can intimacy be scaled?*
*organise a situation where anything can happen. John Cage*
*shape-shifting and precarious labour*
*frequency spectogram (Julian Henriques)*
*beyond language and gesture*
*object oriented philosophy*
*databases and discipline*
*software culture – largest culture humankind has ever known*
*art as a methodology – art as action research*

PPS And – here is one possible interpretation of what “Listening to Firefox” could mean>

 

11 Comments

Emotional Geocaching

I am very interested in how we emotionally react to our surroundings when embarking on aimless wonders (otherwise known as a dérive). This concept is otherwise known as Psychogeography, which according to Guy Debord is:

“the study of the precise laws and specific effects of the geographical environment, consciously organized or not, on the emotions and behavior of individuals.”

The effects of a place on ourselves is very apparent in our day to day lives, from claustrophobic in the city to feeling free and content when back in the countryside. An interesting output from this is how people document their journeys through photography, writing, audio, video, sketching etc.

 

Being someone who does not know the surrounding areas of Westcliff-on-Sea and Leigh-on-Sea I decided to explore my own emotional reaction to these areas, whilst also documenting my travels at specific locations. I decided that I would do it in four ways: through photographing view-points from locations which drew me in; by taking audio recordings at these locations; using a GPS device, record the Longitude and latitude co-ordinates of these locations; lastly, I would also capture these places by recording them as semantic locations. The purpose of all this was as stated above, to explore emotional response, but with all of these tasks in place, it was also to see how this journey worked as an activity and as being something which could be mapped out afterward.

 

As well as absorbing information I also wanted to ‘hack’ the public space and leave something out there which would expand on the semantic locations. As can be seen below, this descriptions were very matter of fact and did not include any reasoning for choosing specific places or emotional reflection. I therefore decided to play on the concept of geocaching and leave my own mini containers (matchboxes so they would be biodegradable), containing my emotional reasoning.

 

Below is my documentation from the journey which I embarked on, starting with a map of the route:

 

 

1) Sat on a bench in front of Chalkwell Hall. 5th along from the left.

N51°32.641′

E000°40.654′

Time: 14:20:38

Sound

 

2) Standing on the bridge over the little stream which runs through Chalkwell Park.

N51°32.658′

E000°40.522′

Time: 14:37:31

Sound

 

3) Standing outside number 141 Kings Road.

N51°32.599′

E000°40.441′

Time: 15:01:07

Sound

 

4) Standing outside number 21 on The Drive.

N51°32.508′

E000°40.439′

Time: 15:23:13

Sound

 

5) In the park facing the row of shops on The Ridgeway.

N51°32.398′

E000°40.472′

Time: 15:44:03

Sound

 

6) On a wall, down a little lane, almost opposite Hall Park Avenue, between numbers 6 and 8 on the The Ridgeway.

N51°32.408′

E000°40.640′

Time: 15:59:19

Sound

 

7) Sitting on the wooden steps leading up to some mini changing tooms on the beach at the end of Chalkwell Avenue.

N51°32.170′

E000°40.714′

Time: 16:17:03

Sound

 

8 ) Almost under the railway bridge on Chalkwell Avenue. On your left as your walk towards the sea, just after the bridge.

N51°32.397′

E000°40.714

Time: 16:33:48

Sound

 

9) Down a creepy walkway/lane thing behind the tennis courts.

N31°32.360

E000°40.649

Time: 16:43:16

Sound

 

10) In the ‘Nature Conservation Garden’ in Chalkwell Park

N51°32.658

E000°40.681

Time: 17:03:40

Sound

 

I tasked myself with this walk as it being something quite experimental and research based; I did not plan the route in advance nor I did not know exactly how I wanted to utilise the data collected from it. Having previously designed pervasive games and interactions in public space for other people in past work, it was refreshing to carry something out for myself and gage my own reactions to a piece, rather than thinking about the unknown other person. Interestingly, the journey became very algorithmic, each task becoming more embedded in every stop off and gradually turning into what one can only describe as laborious. I found it surprising, yet quite understandable, how something very much based on emotional reaction could mutate into something which felt very mechanic and almost forced. One could argue that the methodology set out by myself initially was bound to create this, through using GPS, taking down co-orindinates and writing down descriptions of locations as they were, elaborating on details as little as possible.

 

This still feels very much at the beginning of something to me. I am keen to carry out more ‘aimless walks’, in this way but at some point would also like to think about how other people could interact. with this project. It would be useful to use these ideas in relation to how local people perceive their area and emotionally engage with it.

2 Comments

Metal DEC Lab Interviews

The interviews from the Metal DEC lab are now online at the youtube page

 

 

Leave a comment

Light Responsive Animation

Animation Still

Click here to see an extract of the animation: animation(s)

 

Before I came to the Metal Lab I had been working to create an animation that would connect light to duration and time and explore an idea of exposure in digital format.  The lab offerred a great site to try out the apparatus. The were some nice windows with a view out to the amazing estuarine vista, there was a buzz of activity in the space in front of the window so the opportunity was there.

The apparatus itself would monitor light levels coming through the window using a light dependant resistor. This went through  a micro-controller, into the software and would in turn control  the brightness and contrast of an image captured through a video camera and then the frequency at which the images were captured.  When the images were captured they were uploaded to a server where they could be captured and compiled into a stop-frame animation.

 

Here is the patch for people who like these things:

Screen shot of the Max patch I created

 

 

The apparatus created a space for me to have many conversations and reflect on the critical environment of the labs and begin to take apart and address the individual elements of the work and how they interact with this idea of software culture.

My conclusion is something like…. why am I trying to create a device to capture an image in response to light when I have a camera already?

 

 

Leave a comment

Processes of organisation

I feel pushed to respond to the entry John made after our discussion on Friday morning as I feel that I have been misunderstood and do not find the label of skeptic appropriate. I wish to outline a few of my current frustrations I have with the cultural environment in the UK at the moment.

 

The discussion arose from a question of how to continue once the workshop was over. How can the ground covered over the past week be developed further and whether or not we felt there was anything we could do to support each other in our long term goals for the future.

 

From this we decided that we should try to meet up again in a few months time and set John the role of organising it.

 

The discussion then turned to the ways in which groups and artists organise themselves and the level of control they have in producing and exhibiting the type of work they would like. John brought up the point that he felt there should be a way to circumnavigate  cultural organisations whom he feels siphon off the (public) funds available and act as gatekeepers in cultural production – artists becoming employees of the organsations when they fulfill the remit set for residency programmes or commissions and do not get to wholly dictate the manner in which they work.

 

I perhaps did not make this clear at the time, but yes, I do agree that artists should continually find ways in which to produce and display the type of work that they find critically interrogating and should not chase the funding money pot, adapting their methods to suit the desires of the organisations strategic agenda if they do not feel it fits with their own outlook.

 

However, regardless of whether you are an individual or group working directly with the public funding bodies or you are receiving funds through a supported cultural organisation at some point there will still be the need to provide reasoning for your allocation of funds and evidence of its impact. This is a task in itself and one that requires knowledge of the relationship outlets have to funding bodies and the goals (goalposts) those bodies have had to set and which you must fit into (otherwise there will be no funding). The cultural organisations all came about for their own reasons and in the eyes of funding bodies they must also come up with their own strategic plans for the development of artistic production within their self-designated context. This secondary and perhaps more narrow set of specifications within the funding structures can of course bring about further hurdles for artists to hop over on the way to the fruition of their ideas but these constraints can also be enabling in that they promote particular forms of practice and help to better establish them by developing a platform dedicated to its exploration.

 

I know I’m going of track here but I suppose what I’m trying to say is that regardless of how we manage to gain access to funds so that we may make and promote our work we will still have to provide reasoning to the powers that be as to why we should have it in the first place. The organisations and individuals still have to spend lengthy hours filling out forms and building the case which can at times undermine the work itself.

 

John pushed the notion that a group can continue for the longer term without any central co-ordination. I do not feel that a group or organisation can and as I have tried to outline above it is because in the long run, if they want to access public funds or become larger entities in order to further promote their ideas they will then have to take on the role of administration. You suggested that this would be absorbed into the group and members would take it upon themselves to carry out this task in a act of self governance. I then responded by saying that these less artistic tasks will become more time consuming to the point where people will be unwilling to give up so much of their time unless they can have some sort of recompense, namely income.

 

As Simon pointed out there are pressure points at which organisations do alter their structures, some close in upon their decision making processes, creating a line between management and production and allocating these roles appropriately. It is here that groups must be vigilant in reaffirming the equilibrium so as not to create a hierarchical distinction between the two roles. Rather they should maintain access to broad opinion but not in such a way that it becomes an endless and debilitating task – seeking to strike a balance and knowing when to move on or quit.

 

The insistence during the discussion of entirely open means of organisation where everyone is self-governing, especially in light of funding cuts when opportunities will become all the more sparse, feels a little too close to the recent conservative initiative of the ‘Big Society’. People willing to offer a significant part their time for the greater good. A reasoning that asks people to absorb disproportionate cuts in public spending brought on by the economic crisis by a Government that is trying to get out of providing key public sector services (health, education, culture etc) yet protecting the very financial infrastructures that brought this situation about. I suppose my frustration has been unfairly directed, instead I should be asking the core question effecting all of these instances which is how we value cultural production because at the moment we are pushed into viewing it as a direct capitalist transaction and have to quantify it in monetary terms to prove impact within society. Currently we are being pushed further and further into treating artistic production as a consumer object or service, one that requires a proved rate of return on investment and I find that the re-appropriation by the Conservatives of the long established practice within arts communities of self-organisation into their ‘visions’ for society a difficult pill to swallow. I believe that public provision of culture is something that should be protected and feel it is not being accurately defended against and ever encroaching commercial value system.

Leave a comment

Goldbloggers talk with the artists

On Friday the 25th we spent our day at Metal and had the chance to talk with the artists about their work during the residency. Here’s the result:

 

- Hans

Hans feels like an antenna here at Chalkwell Hall, he’s getting lots of inputs and inspiration from working side to side with other artists. At first, he found it difficult to free himself from business dynamics he’s usually subject to by working in a company, clients demand results, finished products, and don’t seem to care about the importance of the process, which is what the residency here is focused on. Being in between the art and business world, Hans tries to mix the idea of “uniqueness” related to the former with the one of “reproduction” on which the latter is based on. Using code (Action Script and Processing), he generates slight variations of the same piece, resulting in a series of reproduced but still unique images. Also, he is concerned with the role of hardware in digital art as often this is only thought of as art if delivered together with a physical medium. Particularly, digital art is expressed through screens, i.e. artificial light. Hans is here researching the possibility to exhibit digital art through other media such as E-paper or more viable QR codes techniques.

 

 

Other surfaces for digital art

 

- John

John was looking into two different areas and projects, one of which he had already started working on some time before Metal, and the other one set by him as a consequence to a theft within the building. Such system consisted in a small camera filming the building entrance, and a system that would perform face recognition, which was partially working – for example, it would struggle to recognize Graham’s beard.
The first project on the other hand, was involving one out of four swan pedalos that were used for the Liverpool Biennale and then sold on Ebay and that John decided to buy. His purpose was to try and create an “open source” swan pedalo: understanding the unconventional combination of the two expressions, and especially how open source implies that the source has to be available, the idea was to actually expore new methods of collective and maybe modifying use of such pedalo, through people’s interventions and suggestions. In fact, the object could maybe be modified by its ‘users’ as ong as it is still usable.
John’s view of his work is that all of it is continuous, and is not made for a sole and specific purpose, which can in fact be seend in the swan pedalo and the ongoing research about it.

 

 

Computers do not recognize Graham

 

- Stephen

Stephen is investigating the predictive power hidden in data. Data sets can reveal recurring patterns if analyzed over time and such patterns can show tendencies on which a possible model of future things to happen can be drawn. Data mining, a practice increasingly adopted by business to profile users and target marketing accordingly, does that by using algorithms to find informational patterns in databases and produce knowledge out of them (KDD). Various forms of divination such as tasseomancy, a method for reading tea leaves, also use data patterns to forsee the future; Stephen is developing a system that juxtaposes KDD and divination methods: a webcam installed at the bottom of a cup scans the leaves pattern and send the images to the computer that analyzes them through algorithms and store them in a database in which the interpretation of the same pattern given by a human user (divinator) is also stored. In doing so, the parallel human-machine vision of data patterns is merged in the production of knowledge.

 

 

Tasseomancy

 

- Olga

Olga, who is also a PhD student at Goldsmiths and attended our same course, created a light responsive system made up of four light sensors and three vibrating devices whose connection one to the other and then to the body is meant to explore the interaction between the sun and the body. By the time she showed us her project, in which the sensors were attached to different parts of her clothes, they were all responsive although some of the values (especially the one of sensor n4 on the front) had really low values because of the darkness of the room.
Olga is generally interested in infraverbal communication, i.e. the exchange of informations that happens at a non linguistic and more subtle level such as the one of electromagnetic fields and feromons. She is directing her PHD research towards the connection between sun, humans and machines, while the work she is performing with another student is based on interaction dynamics happening out of consciousness between humans, which she is exploring through the use of sensors.

 

 

Wired to the sun

 

- Rob

Rob is working on a system that captures images at set intervals and are affected by light sensors. The images are automatically stored in a remote server and then played as a sequence creating a time lapse effect; the hardware components of the system are a Make Controller to which light sensors are plugged and a camera connected to a Mac Mini. He is using Max MSP/Jitter with a patch that regulates the system and that he had created before joining Metal and edited in order to adapt it to the surroundings at Chalkwell Hall. He showed us some extracts of what has been captured between 4 pm on Thursday the 24th and this morning, resulting in a video where the shades affected by light intensity implied a visual sensation of movement and evolution of the space.

 

 

Timelapse

 

- Markus

Markus is exploring new possibilities in video expression not necessarily based on speech and dialogues but rather focused on montage and post production techniques. He would like to add interactivity to his work as it is something he has not done yet. On Thursday, he went for a walk on the mud (a “non space” in his words) with Graham and filmed short clips which he then edited in order to create a visual pattern. He often adds his own sounds to the videos based on what he’s trying to express.

 

 

Walking on mud

 

- Caroline

Caroline explained that she has not been practicing for a couple of years, and was now trying to explore new areas of research and get back into arts practice: she mainly researched during her stay at Metal, deciding to take on more different kinds of information without narrowing it down too much, in order to identify a focus.
One of the points she got into, was analysing how different means of everyday life exercise control on the very basic tasks of her life itself, such as work, amongst others.

 

Control

 

Leave a comment